1972 Supreme(Mad) 13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T. Ramaprasada Rao and G. Ramanujam, JJ.
A. Gopalakrishna Naidu
Versus
The District Revenue Officer and Competent Authority, Chingleput District and Nandanam, Madras
Appeals Nos. 778 and 779 of 1967 and C.M.P. No. 11262 of 1970 and C.M.P. No. 11263 of 1970 in W.A. Nos. 779 and 778 of 1967 respectively.
Decided On : 11 January 1972
M. V. Krishnan, for Appellant.
The Additional Government Pleader, for Respondent.
Cap arable sale deeds preferred to capitalization method.
Headnote:Madras Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1956-Section 8(3)-Acquisition of lands -Determination of compensation-Market value-Held, lands can not be differentiated when used for the same purpose.
S. No. Nature Acres
A.C. Value fixed by
competent authority
per cent.
Rs. Award by Court
per cent.
Rs. Claim in
appeal
Rs.
294-2-B
295-A Wet 4.48 35 40 80
300-2
302-A Wet 0.7 10 12 80
288-3, 4, 5
291-2, 1 Manavari paddy
cultivation 13.57 31 35 80
295-3-B
302-1-A 44 10 12 80
272-3, 280,
286, 287-1, Dry paddy grown 5.44 20 24 80
287-2, 288-1
2, 299-2 17.72 12 15 45
307-2, 308
306-2 Rainfed dry crops 0.25 10 12 45
2. In the lands acquired, there were five wells, one each in each of the survey Nos. 280, 299/1, 298/3,302/1-A and 307/2. The competent authority valued all these wells and fixed compensation therefor. There were certain structures such as cattle-shed, pump set, etc. in survey No. 298/2, a cattle shed in survey No. 307 and a pumpset in survey No.307/2 and those structures were also valued by the arbitrator. The appellant was aggrieved against the valuation fixed by the competent authority in respect of the two wells situate in survey Nos. 293/3 and 307/2 alone, and the Court enhanced the value of these two wells to Rs. 5,000 each. Not satisfied with the compensation fixed by the lower Court (Arbitrator) for the lands, structures and wells, the appellants are before this Court in A.S. No. 778 of 1967. They claim compensation at the rate of Rs. 80 per cent in respect of lands which are cultivated with paddy and at the rate of Rs. 45 per cent for the other lands in which admittedly dry crops are raised. The appellants also claim an enhanced compensation of Rs. 23,870 for the structures and wells in add