SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 212

M.M.ISMAIL, K.S.PALANISWAMY
E. Gopalakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
Meganathan (died) – Respondent


Advocates:
P. Muthukumaraswami Mudaliar and P. Venkatachalapathy, for Appellant.
K. R. Shanmugham, for Respondent.

Palaniswami, J. — The first defendant in O. S. No. 1513 of 1960 on the file of the Court of the Seventh Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, is the appellant. The relevant facts are these: The plaintiff’s father, Krishnappa Naicker, was the elder son of one Govindappa Naicker, the second son being Elumalai Naicker who was the father of defendants 1 to 5 and husband of the sixth defendant. The plaint A schedule property was acquired by Govindappa Naicker under Exhibit A-1 on 6th June, 1894. After his death, the plaint B schedule property was acquired by Krishnappa Naicker under Exhibit A-2, dated 30th October, 1916. Krishnappa Naicker died in 1922, leaving the plaintiff, his son. Elumalai Naicker died in 1949, leaving defendants 1 to 5 and the widow, the sixth defendant. During the pendency of the suit, the sixth defendant died and thereupon, defendants 1 to 5 were recorded as legal representatives and besides, the seventh defendant, the daughter, was brought on record. The suit was laid for partition of the plaint A and B schedule properties and for allotment of the plaintiff’s half share, with past and future mesne profits. The plaintiff alleged that the suit properties were the joi









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top