P.NARAYANA PILLAI, E.K.MOIDU
Dr. Raghava Menon – Appellant
Versus
Health Inspector, Koduvayur – Respondent
2. The petitioner is a homeopathic practitioner and a staunch believer in the efficacy of that system of medicine. By a notice dated 8th July, 1969, of the first respondent, Health Inspector, Koduvayoor Health Centre, the petitioner was informed that his daughter, one Jayasree aged 5½ shall be produced for inspection and vaccination as a protection against small-pox, on 15th July, 1969, at the time and place specified in that notice. The notice was issued under rule 3(iii) read with rule 11(ii)(d) of the above Rules. The petitioner did not produce the child, though he acknowledged the notice. So the petitioner was prosecuted before the Sub-Magistrate, Chittur, for an offence under rule 13(a) of the Rules, whic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.