C.HONNIAH
D. H. Chikkadoddaiah – Appellant
Versus
Nataraj – Respondent
A complaint was filed against the respondent (accused Sub-Inspector of Police, Law and Order, Kengerigate Police Station, Bangalore-2, by the petitioner (complainant) in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate , First Class (I Court) Bangalore City, alleging that he had committed offences under sections 323, 324, 355, 426, 392 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused raised an objection that the Court had no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offences in view of the provisions of section 170 of the Mysore Police Act 1963, hereinafter referred to as the “Act.” The learned Magistrate upheld the objection of the accused and rejected the complaint. That order is challenged by the complainant in this revision petition.
2. The only question for decision in this case is whether the prosecution of the accused is barred by the provisions of section 170 of the Act.
3. The complainant stated in his complaint the circumstances which gave rise to the prosecution of the accused as follows. On 18th October, 1971, two police constables in uniform with one Lakshmegowda went to his saw mill and informed him that the accused wanted him nd so saying took him to the police station. The accus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.