P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
R. Govindaraj – Appellant
Versus
N. G. Venkateswaran, Legal representative of deceased-Ganapathi Iyer – Respondent
The tenant is the petitioner in this civil revision petition. The respondent herein is the landlord as at present; his father (who is now no more) filed the eviction petition against the petitioner herein for the purpose of getting additional accommodation under section 10 (3) (c) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
2. The petitioner herein has been a tenant under the father of the respondent herein occupying a portion viz., a small shop portion measuring 2’ x 5’ in premises No. 16, Govindappa Naicken Street, G.T., Madras, on a monthly rent of Rs. 20. The petitioner is carrying on a business in the said portion as electrician. The father of the respondent was carrying on business in stationery and general stores in a portion in the ground-floor of the said premises, No. 16, Govindappa Naicken Street, and required the portion in the occupation of the petitioner herein also, bona fide for his additional accommodation. The Rent Controller dismissed the eviction petition. On appeal to the Third Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, eviction was ordered on the finding that the respondent required the building under the occupation of the petitioner bona fide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.