SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 202

K.S.RAMAMURTI, S.MAHARAJAN
P. R. Nallathambi Goundan – Appellant
Versus
Vijaya Raghavan – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Gopalaswamy Ayyangar, for Respondents.

Maharajan, J.-The second defendant appeals.

The suit out of which the appeal arises was laid in forma pauperis by respondents 1 to 3, who were minors and were represented by their next friend and mother Kamalamma, for partition and separate possession of their 3/8th share in the suit properties with mesne profits and costs. Sadagopan, who is no other than the father of the plaintiffs (respondents 1 to 3) was impleaded as the first defendant (fourth respondent herein). Nallathambi Goundan, the appellant, figured as the second defendant in the suit.

2. The facts leading to the institution of the suit may be briefly stated: — Vijayaraghavan, Venkatesan and Ranganathan, the plaintiffs in the suit, are the three sons of Sadagopan, the first defendant, whose father Venkatesa Iyengar instituted two suits O.S. Nos. 2 and 26 of 1945 on the file of the Sub-Court, ‘Salem, for specific performance of two agreements of sale in respect of the suit properties. One agreement related to a portion of the suit properties and had been concluded between Venkatesa Iyengar and Ramaswami Goundan, the father of Nallathambi Goundan, the second defendant in the suit. The other agreement related to the remainin










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top