SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 728

V.V.RAGHAVAN
Rajaram Reddy alias Krishna Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Kesava Reddiar – Respondent


Advocates:
Sarvabhauman and S. Narayanan, for Appellants.
B. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy and Kathirvelu, for Respondents.

Order:—

The plaintiffs are the appellants. The suit is for partition. The plaintiffs are brothers and sons of One Sundara Reddy and all the three formed a joint Hindu family. The suit A Schedule properties were the ancestral properties of the plaintiffs and their father and the case of the plaintiffs is that the father was leading a reckless and immoral life, that there was no legal necessity for him to dispose of suit items 1 to 6 of the A Schedule properties of defendants 1 and 2 for Rs. 2,700 on 20th May, 1964 and items 7 to 9 to the third defendant for Rs. 500 on 29th June, 1953 and items 10 to 13 to the fourth defendant on 16th April, for Rs. 100 and items 14 to 16 to one Muthulakshmi Ammal on 11th August, 1942 for Rs. 462. The plaintiffs’ case is that all the sales were made for Very low prices, that their father Sundara Reddiar died in 1957, that the sales were not for family necessity and therefore not binding on them. The plaint gave the date of birth of the first plaintiff as 12th July, 1941 and of the second plaintiff as 29th February, 1943. The present suit is filed for partition after setting aside the sales in favour of the defendants and for possession of their two-t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top