1971 Supreme(Mad) 666
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.S. Venkataraman and P.R. Gokulakrishnan, JJ.
Subramaniam Chettiar
Versus
A. Murugappan Chettiar
A.A.O. No. 474 of 1969.
Decided On : 15 October 1971
K. Gopalachari and G. Krishnan, for Appellant.
D. Ramaswami Ayyangar, C. Harikrishnan and R. Venkataraghavan, for Respondents.
Decree holder failed to represent the application again.
Headnote:Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order 21, rule 2-Application by decree holder certifying adjustment of decree returned for correction without recording satisfaction-Effect of failure by decree holder in not representing the application.
2. Then on 15th January, 1965, she filed E.P. No. 5 of 1965. It has been marked as Exhibit A-12 in the present proceeding. The first defendant filed a counter stating that the decree had been discharged by a family arrangement, dated 12th March, 1962, which is set out in full. The purport of it was that he had filed a suit, O.S. No. 54 of 1949, for partition against his paternal uncle, Kuttayan Chettiar and had obtained a preliminary decree for partition and accounting. He and C. T. Subramaniam Chettiar (fourth defendant in O.S. No. 132 of 1949) had filed a suit, O.S. No. 27 of 1952, in the Subordinate Judge’s Court, for a declaration that whatever’ liability they might have incurred under the decree in the suit, O.S. No. 132 of 1949, to Deivanai Achi, ultimately it would be her husband, Kuttayan Chettiar, who would be liable for it. By the family arrangement all these matters were settled by mutual undertakings. For his part, the appellant was to execute a sale deed of his half share in the house in Arimalam Village (in the then Pudukottai State) in favour of Deivanai Achi in satisfaction of her decree in O.S. No. 132 of 1949. Further certain shares were standing in the name of the appellant’s father and mother. They had to be transferred to the name of Kuttayan Chettiar (Deivanai Achi’s husband). The appellant should report that the decree in O.S. No. 54 of 1949, had been settled out of Court and he should not press