SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 615

R.SADASIVAM
The Vellore Shrof Kumaraswami Chetti Choultry by the Executive Trustee V. K. Kannappa Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Veerasami – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Sarvabhauman and T. R. Mani, for Petitioner.
P. Narasimhan, for Respondent.

Judgment.-

Petitioner, the Vellore Shrof Kumaraswami Chetty Choultry by Executive Trustee Sri V. K. Kannappa Chettiar seeks to revise the decree and order of the District Judge, in C.R.P. No. 16 of 1968 on his file, setting aside the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller and affirmed by the appellate Authority, on the ground of sub-letting.

2. The petitioner and the respondent entered into the lease Exhibit A-1, for the respondent carrying on a laundry business in the leasehold premises. The petitioner came forward with the case that the respondent-tenant sub-let the premises to one Mani for running a tea shop. The respondent denied sub-letting and stated that as the income from his laundry business was not sufficient for the maintenance of his increasing family, he started the tea shop agreeing to pay additional rent. On a consideration of the oral and documentary evidence in this case., the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority have in detailed and well-considered orders accepted the case of the petitioner and ordered eviction. The learned District Judge has, in revision, filed by the tenant, concurred with the finding of the Rent Controller and affirmed by the Appe









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top