SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 400

K.S.VENKATARAMAN
Annamalai – Appellant
Versus
Narayanaswami Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
Shanmughavel, Jayalakshmi Shanmughavel and S. Hamsia, for Appellant.
K. Swamidurai and J. Srinivasan, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT.-

This is an appeal by the defendants against an order of remand made by the learned Subordinate Judge of Vellore remanding the suit O.S. No, 462 of 1963 for trial once again by the trial Court, the District Munsiff of Ami. The suit was filed by plaintiffs 1 and 2 for partition of a half share in the A Schedule properties items I to 5 and for declaration of title and possession of the B Schedule properties items 1 to 3. The suit was decreed by the trial Court in respect of items a to 5 of A Schedule and was otherwise dismissed. The plaintiffs preferred an appeal. It was heard by the learned Subordinate Judge. He thought that two additional issues were necessary which had not been framed by the trial Court and solely on that ground he set aside the order of the learned District Munsif and remanded the suit for fresh trial permitting the parties to adduce additional evidence. Aggrieved by that the defendants have preferred this appeal.

2. To decide the question involved, it is necessary to refer briefly to the pleadings of the parties. There was one Kuppiah Pillai. He died leaving two sons, Narayanaswami Pillai (first plaintiff) and Govindaraju Pillai. Govindaraju Pillai is n













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top