SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 197

G.RAMANUJAM
R. Tulasi – Appellant
Versus
Hameed Bi – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Ganapathy Subramania Iyer, for Petitioner.
M. Srinivasan for K.N. Balasubramanian, for 1st Respondent.
R. Rajagopala Iyer, for Respondents 2, 3 and 7.

ORDER.-

This revision petition is directed against the order of the lower Court refusing to implead the petitioner herein as a party defendant in O.S.No. 644 of 1966 filed by the first respondent herein. The first respondent filed the above suit for recovery of possession of certain properties from six persons on the ground that they were her lessees, and that they had not only committed wilful default in the payment of the arrears of rent but also repudiated their tenancies. The said suit was resisted by the said six persons on the ground that they were not the tenants of the plaintiff first respondent, but that they were the tenants under the petitioner herein. After filing of the written statement by the said six persons the petitioner filed an application to implead himself as a party defendant in the suit and that application has been dismissed by the lower Court not only on the ground that he is an unnecessary party but also on the ground that he cannot be said to have any valid title to the suit property after considering the documents filed by the petitioner along with his application under Order 1, Rule 10 (2), Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner is aggrieved against the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top