SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Mad) 229

K.VEERASWAMI, P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
Subramania Pillai – Appellant
Versus
Rajakkani Nadar. – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Champakesa Ayyangar and K.C. Srinivasan, for Petitioner.
S. Chellaswamy, for Respondent.

Veeraswami, C.J.- The legal representative of deceased tenant, against whom an order of eviction had been obtained, is the petitioner. While the application for eviction in execution of that order was pending, the tenant died on 17th October, 1963. The application for bringing on record the petitioner as the tenant’s legal representative was filed in March, 1964, and it was ordered by the District Munsif and that order was confirmed by the District Judge. The petition to revise the order came in the first instance before Alagiriswami, J., who not being inclined to the view of the then Chief Justice in C.R.P. No. 929 of 1960, referred it for disposal by a Division Bench. 2. The petitioner relies on rule 32 of the Rules framed under the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, which provides for one month from the date of the death of the person concerned or the date of the knowledge of the death of the person concerned as limitation for an application for bring the legal representatives of a deceased person on record. Rule 32 reads:

“Time for bring the legal representatives on record in proceedings: Every application for making the legal representative or representatives of a d





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top