K.VEERASWAMI, S.MAHARAJAN
Mayilsami Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Rammoorthi Chettiar – Respondent
The respondent applied for eviction in February, 1960 which was ordered. Since the tenant failed to deposit the rent within the time allowed, the order was put to execution and the landlord entered upon possession in July, 1960. Eventually the revision petition directed against the order of eviction was allowed by this Court on the ground that the respondent should have impleaded the newly inducted tenant. On the strength of this order of reversion, the tenant, who is the petitioner before us, applied for restitution. But the application was dismissed on the ground that it was out of time under the provisions of section 4 (5) of the Madras Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955. The petition under consideration is to revise that order.
When the petition came before one of us, it was felt that there was no jurisdiction vested in the Revenue
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.