SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Mad) 84

K.S.RAMAMURTI, K.S.PALANISWAMY
Manikka Narasimhachari – Appellant
Versus
M. V. Ramasubbier – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Gopalaswami Ayyangar and K. Parasaran, for Appellant.
V. S. Rangaswami Ayyangar, for Respondents.

Ramamurti, J.-The second defendant in O.S. No. 99 of 1960 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Madurai is the appellant. The ancestor of the parties was one Manicka Sankaranarayana Iyer, who died in 1928, leaving behind him five sons, (a) one Venkatachalam Iyer, the father of the first plaintiff, (b) Ramudu Iyer, the father of plaintiffs 2 to 5, (c) one Ramakrishna Iyer, the first defendant (his sons being defendants 2, 4 and 5), (d) Narasimhier, the third defendant and (e) one Lakshmana Iyer, since dead, whose widow is the sixth plaintiff. This Manicka Sankaranarayana Iyer was conducting charity and Annadanam trust and certain other charities and in order to secure efficient and proper performance of the charities, the ancestor, Manicka Sankaranarayana Iyer and his sons executed a settlement deed marked Exhibit A-. on 3rd June, 1908 The said deed inter alia provides that Sankaranarayana Iyer, the father, should be the first trustee, that after his death the senior-most male member of the family should be the trustee turns. The present first defendant is now the senior-most male member and is therefore functioning as managing trustee and looking after the trust. Certain properties














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top