K.VEERASWAMI, K.N.MUDALIYAR
P. N. Raju Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary, Home Department (Accommodation Controller), – Respondent
“The Government are satisfied that the claim of the landlord that he required the shop portion in the occupation of the tenant for starting and running a business of his own is bona fide. But the landlord is yet to commence the business.”
On that view, the order proceeded on the basis that the landlord had no remedy under the provisions of the Act and exercise of the powers under section 29 was called for. The appellant unsuccessfully pursued the matter before the Government by means of what he called a revision petition which was eventually dismissed on 28th December, 1968. On 24th January, 1969 he moved this Court under Article
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.