SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 231

K.S.RAMAMURTI
Sinna Ponnu – Appellant
Versus
Singaru Odayar – Respondent


Advocates:
T. R. Ramachandran and N. Varadarajan, for Appellants.
P. R. Gokulakrishnan and B. Soundarapandian, for Respondents.

Judgment.

The first plaintiff, since dead and represented by his heirs, plaintiffs 2 to 6, (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) entered into an agreement with the 1st defendant for the purchase of a house and site in Mayuram, under an agreement, Exhibit A-1 dated 19th March, 1960 executed by the first defendant for a price of Rs. 1,000. On 9th September, 1961, the first defendant sold the property to the second defendant for a sum of Rs. 1,900. Notices passed between the parties in which the plaintiff’s claim was denied and the plaintiff filed the present suit for specific performance of the agreement, Exhibit A-1.

The first defendant resisted the suit on the ground inter alia that the agreement of sale is vague, that there was no consensus ad idem between the parties as to the exact extent to be sold, that subsequent to the agreement of sale, the plaintiff gave up his rights and that only thereafter the property was sold to the second defendant. The latter, while adopting the pleas raised by the first defendant raised the further plea that he is a bona fide purchaser for value and in good faith without knowledge of the prior agreement of sale.

The trial Court negatived all the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top