SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 204

K.S.VENKATARAMAN
M. A. A. Raoof – Appellant
Versus
K. G. Lakshmipathi – Respondent


Advocates:
K.N. Subramanyam, for Appellant.
V. Shyamalam, for Respondent.

Order.-

This appeal raises an interesting question of the validity of attachment of certain shales belonging to the judgment-debtor. The decree-holder Lakshmi-pathi obtained a decree in O.S. No. 2344 of 1960 on the file of the City Civil Con-by consent. He filed E.P. No. 1458 of 1966 to recover a sum of Rs 8 000 odd by attachment and sale of the shares which the judgment-debtor Raoof held in a company called Intrac Pharmaceutical (Private) Limited, Industrial Estate Ambattur. An interim prohibitory order was issued both to the judgment-dehtor and to the company. The company did not appear and object The judgment-debtor appeared and took time to file a counter. He did not file the counter in time and so the attachment was made absolute. Against that order he has filed the present appeal.

The point taken on behalf of the appellant by his learned Counsel Sri K. N. Subramanian is that though the judgment-debtor Raoof lives within the jurisdiction of the City Civil Court, Madras and the shares also are with him the City Civil Court had no jurisdiction to issue the prohibitory order, because the place of business of the company is Ambattur, outside the jurisdiction of the City Civil Cour




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top