SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Mad) 405

P.RAMAKRISHNAN
P. K. Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
Municipality of Coimbatore, represented by its Commissioner Coimbatore – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Ramachandran, for Petitioner.
K. Gopalaswami, for Respondent.

ORDER.-

The petitioner is running a flour mill in No. 8/177, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, Coimbatore. He applied to the Municipality on 27th April, 1961, under section 250 of the District Municipalities Act for permission to instal machinery for starting a flour mill in the abovesaid premises. No order was communicated by the Municipality within thirty days of the receipt of the application. Relying upon the provision in section 321 (11) of the District Municipalities Act, the petitioner assumed that his application had been allowed and put up the machinery. From , 1961 onwards, he had been running his flour mill and applied for renewal of the licence in 1962, 1963 and 1964 paying the licence fee thereafter, but no orders were passed on those applications for renewal. But on 31st July, 1964, the Municipality passed orders rejecting his application relying on the circumstances that no installation of machinery could be allowed in the premises because it is situated in an area covered by the Town Planning Scheme and unless the scheme was varied, such installation could not be permitted. The petitioner states that by reason of section 321 (11) of the District Municipalities Act above refe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top