SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Mad) 194

P.KUNHAMED KUTTI
C. R. Neelakantan – Appellant
Versus
C. Bakthavatsalam – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Srinivasa Rao, for Appellant.
V. Ganapathisubramania Iyer, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT.-

This application by the plaintiff is to implead Saidapet Annadhana Samajam by its Secretary, C. Bakthavatsalam as second defendant. There is a connected application for consequential amendment of the cause title and the several paragraphs of the plaint. That matter is not now before me as the said application is not stamped or numbered.

Applicants plaintiffs have filed the above suit for framing a scheme for safeguarding the properties of the aforesaid Samajam, and its income, for proper administration of the affairs of the Samajam, for removal of Bakthavatsalam from all posts which he claims to hold as, according to the plaintiffs, he has committed various acts of breach of trust, for appointment of a Commissioner-cum-Receiver to take inventory and for accounts, etc. The plaint is laid under section 92, Civil Procedure Code, and the Advocate-General has given consent to the institution of the suit as originally framed wherein C. Bakthavatsalam is impleaded as the sole defendant.

The averments in the plaint are to the effect that taking advantage of the factions within the Samajam, Bakthavatsalam has committed various acts of mismanagement and breaches of trust detrimental











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top