T.RAMAPRASADA RAO
M. Shahul Hameed – Appellant
Versus
Kanda Iyer – Respondent
The first defendant is the petitioner in this Civil Revision Petition. The plaintiff filed a suit for a declaration that he is entitled as of right to be in possession of the suit property by virtue of an assignment which he secured under deed dated 23rd September, 1963 from one Chockalinga Chettiar with whom admittedly the first defendant entered into a registered agreement of lease on 5th September, 1963. After entering into such a lease agreement with Chockalinga Chettiar, the first defendant purports to put the second defendant in possession of the property.. The plaintiff, who by then has secured a right to obtain possession of the property files this suit but valued the same for purposes of Court-fee and jurisdiction under section 43 (d) of the Court-fees Act read with section 25 (d) of the said Act. After the written statement was filed, he (the plaintiff) sought to amend the plaint by substituting section 42 (c) instead of section 43 (d) as originally stated by him in the plaint. The learned District Munsif after hearing all the contention of the parties allowed the amendment. The main question, that is now argued before me by the first defendant who has come up to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.