SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Mad) 315

A.ALAGIRISWAMI
Raso Moopanar – Appellant
Versus
T. K. Ramamurthy Iyer – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Ramaswami and R. Ganesan, for Petitioner.
K. Raman, for Respondent.

Order.-

This is a petition under section 6-B of Madras Act XXV of 1955 to revise the Order of the Revenue Court, Kumbakonam, in P.No. 1319 of 1963. The tenant is the petitioner. The landlord filed the application under section 3 (4) (a) of the Act for eviction of the tenant on the ground of arrears of rent. The Revenue Court ordered the tenant to pay the arrears by 30th January, 1964, and to report to the Court on 31st January, 1964. The tenant actually paid the arrears of rent on 31st January, 1964, and on objection taken by the landlord, the Revenue Court refused to excuse the delay of one day in the payment of arrears and ordered eviction. It appears that pursuant to the order of eviction the tenant has also been evicted.

The first question for consideration is whether the Revenue Court had the power to excuse the delay of one day in payment of the arrears of rent. It has now been held by a Bench of this Court that the Revenue Court could do so, even when the original order provided for eviction on failure to pay the rent in time and even if the application to excuse delay is filed after the expiry of the period. There have been cases where when the matter came up on revision bef







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top