1965 Supreme(Mad) 181
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice K. Srinivasan
Manghraj Thekurdas
Versus
The Accommodation Controller of Madras
Writ Petition No. 120 of 1964.
Decided On : 21 June 1965
S.K.L. Raton of K.C. Jacob, S.K.L. Ratan and R. Srinivasan, for Petitioner.
K.S. Bakthavatsalam for Additional Government Pleader, on behalf of Respondent.
Government has jurisdiction to allow any person no longer in Govt. job to continue in occupation.
Headnote:Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960-Section 3-Power of Government-Government has jurisdiction to allow any person no longer in Govt. job to continue in occupation and also used re-allot the same premises after being vacated by such person.
Premises No. 16, New Avadi Road, Kilpauk, appears to have been taken over by the Government and allotted to a Government servant in the year 1952. In 1963, the petitioner purchased this premises from the previous owner. At that time, the first floor was occupied by one C. K. Nair and the ground floor by one Mrs. Sumati. The petitioner sought the release of the premises for the occupation of his son. He was informed that C. K. Nair was a Government servant and the first floor had been allotted to him by the Government. On a notice issued by him to the other tenant, she vacated the premises and handed over the key to the Accommodation Controller. Thereafter, the petitioner sought the release of the entire premises, but he was informed by the Accommodation Controller that the ground floor was being allotted to another Government servant. The petition originally proceeded on the basis that such an order of allotment had been made ten days after the intimation of the vacancy by Mrs. Sumati, but certain facts which came to the notice of the petitioner subsequently have altered the entire complexion of the case and these facts are as below. Mr. Sumati, who was originally allotted the ground floor, was an employee of the Central Government. It appears that on 12th December, 1959 he was transferred from Madras to Calcutta. Thereafter his wife, Mrs. Sumati, continued to occupy the premises, though Mr. Sumati as a Government servant who was no longer employed in the city of Madras, was not entitled to any allotment of accommodation. It further appears that this Sumati retired from Government service on 9th February, 1961. As stated already, after the petitioner’s notice to Sumati, Mrs. Sumati vacated the premises on the 26th December, 1963.
In the course of the arguments, Mr. S.K.L. Ratan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has pointed out that when Sumati ceased to be employed in Madras, the Government were not entitled to retain possession of the premises unless it was needed for any Government purpose or for the purpose of any Government servant. Mrs. Sumati, who was actually in occupation of the premises from 12th December, 1959 onwards, was certainly not so entitled to occupy it. The fact that from that date till the present day a non-Government servant was permitted to be in occupation of the premises, it is urged, should deprive the Government of any further right to allot the premises to a Government servant in 1964, and it is on this short ground that the order of allotment is sought to be quashed and a further order for restoration of possession of this part of the premises to the owner is also sought.
In the counter-affidavit filed by the Accommodation Controller, some of the facts have not been clearly disclosed. It is stated herein that K. Sumati, who had been in occupation since 1952, intimated on 20th December, 1963 the intention to vacate the ground floor with effect from 25th December, 1963. The counter-affidavit reads as if this Sumati was entitled to be in occupation of the premises till the latter date. But, during the course of the arguments, learned Counsel appearing; for the respondent does not deny the fact that Sumati ceased to be entitled to occupation of the premises from 12th December, 1959 onwards.
It is however further contended that the premises continued to be in occupation of the Government all along and that the allotment order made on 24th January, 1964, is within the scope of the powers of the Government.
It seems to me that the undisputed facts disclose a somewhat unfortunate state of affairs. It is now conceded on behalf of the Accommodation Controller that from and after 12th December, 1959 no Government servant was in occupation of the premises. The Government’s power to requisition the premises and allot it to a Government servant stems from section 3 of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. It is obvious from the provisions of this Act that if the Government has no use for the