SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Mad) 364

G.R.JAGADISAN
S. P. Sahul Hamid – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Abdul Majid – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Ramamurthi Ayyar for T.R. Mani, for Appellant.
T.R. Ramachandran, for Respondent.

Jagadisan, J.-

This Second Appeal arises out of proceedings in execution of a mortgage decree. The appellant is a Court-auction purchaser in execution of that decree. Respondents 1 to 3 claimed that they were entitled to the eastern half of the property purchased by the appellant. The proceedings commenced as an original suit in the first instance, but was subsequently converted into an application under section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code. Respondents 1 to 3 were the plaintiffs and the appellant was the first defendant. The first Court,the executing Court, dismissed the application, but on appeal by the appellant herein before the Court of Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli, respondents 1 to 3 have been declared entitled to the property claimed by them. Hence this second appeal.

The facts are as follows:- The subject-matter of the dispute between the parties is a house within the limits of Melapalayam Panchayat. The entire house is described in the application as the first schedule. The portion claimed by the respondents 1 to 3 is described in the second schedule. The second schedule is the eastern half of the entire house. This property originally belonged to one Muhamad Abdullah





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top