P.S.KAILASAM
V. Seethalakshmi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
P. R. Rajammal – Respondent
The petition is filed by the tenant against the order of the District Judge Madurai, fixing Rs. 120 as the fair rent for the premises. The respondents, who were the petitioners before the Rent Controller, Madurai Town, filed a petition for fixing the fair rent at Rs. 350 per month. The present petitioner, who was the respondent before the Rent Controller, resisted the application and submitted that the rent of Rs 32-8-0, which she was paying, was the proper rent. She also submitted that the landlords agreed for fixing the rent at Rs. 32-8-0 and, therefore, it was not open to the landlords to ask for enhanced rent now. It is unnecessary to consider the contentions raised by the tenant, as the petition has to be remanded to the Rent Controller for disposal again on a legal objection taken by the petitioner.
In deciding the question of fair rent, the Rent Controller based his conclusion on the report submitted by a Commissioner appointed by him. After referring to the accommodation in the premises, the Rent Controller also accepted the report regarding the location, depreciation, etc. It is admitted that the Rent Court is not a civil Court and the Civil Procedure Code is not ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.