ANNA CHANDY
Parameswara Iyer – Appellant
Versus
Mrithunjaya Panicker – Respondent
The charge against the accused was that they formed themselves into an unlawful assembly with the common object of taking forcible possession of a property in the complainant’s possession and put up a shed. Accused 2 and 7 pleaded that they were in possession of the property and had filed a suit for establishing their claims. The other accused are their friends and associates.
The complainant got delivery of the property through Court as early as 1958 in execution of the decree in O.S. No. 369 of 1952. Subsequent to the delivery the defendants in that case trespassed into the buildings in the property and that necessitated another suit for demolising the buildings at his cost and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the property. Pending suit the property was managed by a Receiver appointed by the Court. That suit was also decreed and in pursuance of the decree the Receiver surrendered possession of the property to the complainant and the buildings wer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.