K.SANKARAN, JOSEPH, ANNA CHANDY
State of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Kunjanda Vaidyan Varghese Vaidyan – Respondent
The question of law raised in the first 5 References and in the next Revision Petition is practically the same and hence all of them were heard together. They are also disposed of by the present common order.
Criminal Reference No. 21 of 1957 is by the Sessions Judge at Alleppey and he has recommended under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that the committal order which is the basis of Sessions Case No. 32 of 1956 on the file of his Court may be quashed since it is an illegal order passed in violation of the mandatory provisions contained in clause (4) of section 207-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The ground of illegality is stated to be that the Magistrate who committed the accused to stand their trial in the Sessions Court, has passed the order of committal without examining all the witnesses mentioned in the charge-sheet filed by the police as witnesses to the actual commission of the alleged offence. In Criminal Reference No. 22 of 1957 also a similar recommendation has been made by the same Judge in respect of the committal order which is the basis of Sessions Case No. 42 of 1957 on the file of the same Court.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.