SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Mad) 124

RAMAKRISHNAN, RAMACHANDRA.IYER
Valliammai Achi – Appellant
Versus
Velu Servai – Respondent


Advocates:
K.S. Ramabhdra Ayyar, for Appellant.
M. Natesan and S. Gopalaratnam, for Respondent.

Ramachandra Iyer, J.-

These appeals arise from the Judgment of Veeraswami, J., setting aside a preliminary decree for partition passed by the lower Courts. One Alangaram Chettiar who has been examined as P.W. 2 in the case had two sons through his wife, Valliammai, Samban Chettiar and Alangaram Chettiar (first defendant). On nth August, 1935, the suit properties were purchased on behalf of Samban Chettiar and Alangaram Chettiar who were then minors. They were represented in the sale transaction by their father. Samban and the first defendant were thus the co-owners of the property. Samban died in the year 1942 and his mother Valliammai succeeded to his share in the property as his heir. It appears from the evidence, that subsequent to the death of Samban the precise date not being ascertainable — the patta for the property was transferred in the name of the first defendant alone. It is now found by all the Courts that Alangaram Chettiar, his wife Valliammai and their son the first defendant were living together and that the property was managed by the first of them. The first defendant attained the age of majority during the year 1950. Almost immediately he alienated the entirety o












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top