SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Mad) 378

JAGADISAN, P.S.KAILASAM
M. K. Sivagaminatha Pillai – Appellant
Versus
K. Nataraja Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
M. Natesan, for Appellant.
M. S. Venkatarama Ayyar and V. Krishnan, for Respondents.

Kailasam, J.-

The plaintiff (appellant herein) filed a suit before the Subordinate Judge of Tirunelveli for recovery of Rs. 12,537-11-11 based upon a foreign judgment obtained by the plaintiff in the District Court, Colombo. The plaintiff and his mother Kuppammal were trading as partners under the name and style of ‘M. K. Sivagaminathan’, in Princess Street, Bombay. Defendants 1 and 2 were carrying on business in partnership in Colombo under the name and style of ‘Jayalakshmi and Company’. Defendants 1 and 2 borrowed from the plaintiff several sums under hundis drawn on the defendants and made payable thirty days after sight to the order of the Indian Overseas Bank, Ltd., Colombo. Defendants 1 and 2 accepted to pay the amount due under these hundies but failed to pay when they were presented to them on the due dates.

The plaintiff and his mother filed a suit No. 15437/S on 7th October, 1953, in the District Court at Colombo for recovery of Rs. 10,671-35 cents. Summons were issued to defendants 1 and 2 and they accepted the summons. Defendants 1 and 2 filed proxy through their Proctor and moved for the grant of leave to appear and defend the action unconditionally. The Additional Dist























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top