SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Mad) 179

P.V.RAJAMANNAR, VEERASWAMI
Rajagopala Ayyar – Appellant
Versus
Avadai Velalar – Respondent


Advocates:
M. Natesan, for Appellants.
T. V. Balakrishnan, for Respondents.

Veeraswami, J.-

This appeal from the judgment of Ramaswami Gounder, J., arises out of a suit for partition and separate possession of one-third share in the properties conveyed to the plaintiff and his two brothers, defendants 3 and 4, by delendant 43 under a sale deed dated, 28th March, 1946. The sale was for a consideration of Rs. 3,000 of which Rs. 1,000 was paid by the plaintiff to defendant 43 at the time of the execution of the sale deed. The vendor, evidently, having at the instance of his brothers, defendants 1 and 2, refused to register the sale deed, the plaintiff and defendants 3 and 4 got it compulsorily registered. The property conveyed under the sale deed is in Mannankadu village in Pattukottai taluk, which is a shrotriam inam consisting of 16 shares. Panchapakesa Ayyar and his sons, defendants 1, 2 and 43, owned 2-12-9 shares out of them under a Court auction purchase. Even after the death of Panchapakesa Ayyar, his three sons continued, as before, as members of a joint Hindu family. ‘Under the said sale deed, defendant 43 sold his undivided one-third share in the 2-12-9 shares in the village.

A number of alienees from the father as well as defendants 1 and 2 were imp
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top