VEERASWAMI
The Corporation of Madras – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalakshmi Ammal – Respondent
This Second Appeal by the Corporation of Madras arises out of a suit which is instituted for recovery of a sum of Rs. 702-11-9 together with interest. The claim relates to the proportionate amount payable by the defendant to the Corporation in respect of a certain work done by the latter in metalling and lighting a private street in S.A. No. 94/2 in Mambalam, Madras. There is no dispute that the liability of the defendant arose under section 218 (1) of the Madras City Municipal Act, 1919. One of the defences was that the suit was barred by limitation, in view of section 390-A of that Act.
The trial Court held that the suit was barred by limitation in so far as it related to the recovery of charges for improvements under Exhibit A-11 but that the claim in respect of expenses incurred for lighting except items 7 and 8 was in time. The trial Court decreed the suit on that basis. On appeals preferred by both the Corporation as well as the defendant, in so far as the decree of the trial Court was against the one or the other, the learned Additional Judge of the City Civil Court agreed with the findings of the trial Court and dismissed both the appeals. The aggrieved Corporatio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.