SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Mad) 144

GANAPATIA PILLAI
V. Janakamma – Appellant
Versus
V. G. Rangaraj – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Venkatadri and K. Natarajan, for Petitioner.
M.R. Vijayarangam, for Respondent.

Judgment.-

This Civil Revision is directed against the appellate order of the Court of Small Causes at Madras in H.R.A. No. 78 of 1957. That appeal was preferred against I.A. No. 1120 of 1956 in H.R.C. No. 4376 of 1956. The petitioner before me, the landlady of the premises, occupied by the respondent before me, as a tenant, applied to the Rent Controller for eviction on the ground of arrears in payment of rent. After counter-statement was filed in the proceedings the Rent Controller acting under the Proviso to section 7, clause (2) of Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1949, directed the tenant to pay all arrears of rent up to date. After this order had been made the proceeding came on for hearing on 31st December, 1956. That day the following order was passed by the Rent Controller:

"Parties by counsel. Arrears not paid as directed. Respondent is absent when called thrice. Proceedings are stopped and eviction is ordered under section 7-A (4) of the Madras Rent Control Act."

Thereafter the tenant filed I.A. No. 1120 of 1956 to set aside the order of eviction passed on 31st December, 1956. This I.A. was disposed of by the following order passed by the Rent Controller on 7t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top