SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Mad) 128

RAJAGOPALAN, RAMACHANDRA.IYER
The Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madras – Appellant
Versus
A. P. S. Sethurama Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
The Government Pleader (K. Veeraswami) and N. Ramachandran, for Appellant in all the appeals.
M. K. Nambiyar, T. R. Srinivasan, T. Ramalingam, K. S. Desikan, K. Raman and R. Sitaraman, for Respondents in Appeal No. 63 of 1955.
A. V. Narayanaswami Ayyar, R. Venkatachalam, K. S. Desikan, K. Raman, R. Sitaraman and T. R. Srinivasan, for Respondents in Appeal No. 131 of 1955.
A. V. Narayanaswami Ayyar, R. Venkatachalam, K. S. Desikan, K. Raman and T. R. Srinivasan, for Respondents in Appeal No. 132 of 1955.

Ramachandra Iyer.j —

These appeals relate to Sri Dandayuthapaniswami temple at Ayyampalayam, Musiri Taluk, Tiruchirapalli District. It will be convenient to refer to the rank of the parties as mentioned in A.S. No. 63 of 1955. That appeal arises out of a suit, O.S. No. 7 of 1951 originally filed by the first respondent. Respondents 2 and 3 who were impleaded as defendants to the suit were later trans posed as plaintiffs 2 and 3. A.S. No. 131 of 1955 arises out of O.S. No. 8 of 1951 filed by the sixth respondent. The suits were filed under section 57 of the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act (Act II of 1927), to set aside a scheme framed by the Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Board in O.A. No. 513 of 1949 for the management of Sri Dandayuthapaniswami temple. The Board, who was the first defendant to the suit, is now represented by the appellant, the Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Madras. Appeal No. 132 of 1955 is filed against the order of the Lower Court in O.P. No. 131 of 1951, which set aside the order of the Hindu Religious Endowments Board in O.A. No. 513 of 1949 which held that the temple was one to which the provisions of Act II of 1927 would









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top