SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Mad) 260

SUBRAHMANYAM
Thanga Mayil Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Pappa alias Fathima Bibi – Respondent


Advocates:
A. V. Narayanaswami Ayyar, for Appellant.
V. Natesan, for Respondents.

Judgment. —

This appeal arises out of a suit instituted in the Court of the District Munsif of Tiruchirapalli, for possession of certain properties alleged by the plaintiff to be wakf properties. The District Munsif granted a decree as prayed for. The second defendant’s appeal to the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, was dismissed. The third defendant to whom the second defendant has transferred the property is the appellant in this second appeal.

The property belonged to one Hyder Masthan Sahib. He executed a wakf deed dedicating the property for the use of the Prophet on 12th October, 1946. In the document Hyder Masthan said that the property was till then his and would thereafter be the Prophet’s. Hyder Masthan declared that he would be the Muttavalli during his lifetime and after his death, the plaintiff, his daughter by his deceased first wife, would be the Muttavalli; and that after her death, the Muttavallis would be her descendants. There was also a direction in the document that, out of the income from the property, fatia should be preformed in the name of the Prophet and that eleven fakirs should be fed on His birthday, that Rs. 5 should be spent for the purpose ; that ki










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top