SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Mad) 372

RAMASWAMI GOUNDER
Gnanambal Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Kannappa Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
N.R. Raghavachariar, for Petitioner.
Respondent, not represented.

Judgment.-

These are two Civil Revision Petitions sought to be filed against the Decrees and Judgments of the learned District Judge of South Arcot in C.M.A. Nos. 11 and 12 of 1958, confirming the Orders and Decrees of the learned District Munsif of Tirukoilur in O.S. Nos. 309 and 310 of 1956.

The facts are: The suit properties originally belonged to one Ramalingam Pillai, the father of the revision petitioner-plaintiff, Gnanambal Ammal. According to the plaintiff, Ramalingam Pillai died intestate and she became entitled to the suit properties after the lifetime of her mother Periyanayaki, who died in September, 1944. Kannappa Pillai (sole respondent in C.R.P. No. 1709 of 1958 and the second respondent in C.R.P. No. 1723 of 1958) is the brother of Periyanayaki. On 14th May, 1943, Periyanayaki Ammal executed a registered settlement deed which recites that she got the properties under the registered will of her husband dated 10th October, 1930 and had settled one half of the properties upon Kannappa Pillai and the other half on the children of the plaintiff. The plaintiff has subsequently executed sale deeds, mortgages, dated 30th October, 1945 2rd April, 1953 and 6th September, 1953 (















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top