SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Mad) 348

RAMASWAMI GOUNDER
Arumuga Goundar – Appellant
Versus
Natchimuthu Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
T. K. Subramania Pillai, for Appellant.
V. C. Viraraghavan, for Respondent.

Judgment

This is an appeal arising from the decree and judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, in A.S. No. 21 of 1954, confirming the decree and judgment of the learned District Munsif, Dindigul, in O.S. No. 72 of 1953.

Kuppanna Pillai, Ammayappa Pillai and Arumugham Pillai were three brothers who effected a partition 25 years ago. The lands in suit fell to the share of Arumugham Pillai. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 are the sons of Kuppanna Pillai. Plaintiffs 4 and 5 are the sons of Ammayappa Pillai. Arumugham Pillai died in 1949, leaving defendant 1, his widow, as his heir. Defendant 1 has mortgaged the suit lands in favour of defendant 2 by a deed, dated 3rd February, 1953 for Rs. 2,500.

It is in these circumstances that the plaintiffs have filed a suit for a declaration that the mortgage deed, dated 3rd February, 1953, executed by defendant 1 in favour of defendant 2 is not valid and binding upon them, the reversioners, beyond the lifetime of the widow, on the ground that there was no necessity to mortgage the lands and that the mortgage is not supported by consideration.

Defendant 1 remained ex parte. Defendant 2 contested the suit on the ground that the mortgage was validly exec












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top