SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Mad) 327

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice Panchapakesa Ayyar and Mr. Justice Ganapatia Pillai
The State of Madras by the Collector of Madras
Versus
Balaji Chettiar
Appeal Nos. 100 to 105, 107 to 122, 124 to 130, 219, 243, 270 to 272, 297, 300, 312, 313, 375 to 377, 414 to 417, 605, 612 to 628 1044 and 1087 of 1953.
Decided On : 05 December 1957

Advocates:
The Government Pleader (B. V. Viswanatha Ayyar), R. G. Rajan, C. Rangaswami Ayyangar, T. R. Sundaram, R. Desikan, M.S. Sethu and T. Ramakrishna, for the State.
K. Rajah Ayyar, V. Tyagarajan, V. C. Gopalaratnam, N. R. Raghavachariar, S. E. Sankara Ayyar, V. Ganapathi Ayyar, T.G. Nagaswami Ayyar, J. Nagarajan, S. Rangaswami Ayyangar, T. R. Srinivasa Ayyangar, S. V. Venkatasubramaniam, K. Srinivasan, P. R. Varadarajan, S. K. Ahmed Meeran, M. Khaja Mohideen, M. Karunakara Nambiar, T. R. Srinivasa Ayyar, M. Natesan, T. S. Rangarajan, S. Ramanatha Davey, V. K. Ramanatha Ayyar, Pais, Loho and Alvares, S. R. Krishnamacharya, D. R. Krishna Rao, M. Subramania Sarma, V. N. Srinivasa Rao, C. S. Rajappa, Subramaniam and Rajagopal, K. G. Manickavasagam, P. Thandavakrishnayya Naidu, S. P. Rajabathar, V. V. Raghavan, V. Srinivasan P. Ram Reddi, V. Venkatarama Reddy, S. Ramayya Nayak, D. N. Narasaraju Y. Suryanarayana, M. R. Narayanaswami, A. Nagarajan, A. Visivanathan, V. Somasundarani C. Santhanamurthi Naidu, K. Soundararajan and T. Krishnaraja Naicker, for the Claimants in the various cases.

Solatium an integral part of the compensation.

Headnote:Madras City Improvements Trusts Act, 1945-Land Acquisition Act, 1874-Section 23 - Payment of solatium for acquisition of land under city Improvement Trusts Act-Abolition of solatium under Madras Act, 1950 discriminatory under Article 14 of Constitution.

       

Panchapakesa Ayyar, J.—These are sixty-five appeals and four memoranda of cross-objections, and relate to two big land acquisitions resulting in the two batches of appeals and memoranda of cross-objections. The first big land acquisition is what can be shortly called the Mandavalli Scheme, for building houses by the Madras City Improvement Trust. This covers an area of 1,400 grounds of land bounded on the east by the South Beach Road, on the west by Brodies Road on the north by Mandavalli Street and the Mada Church Road, and on the South by the Adyar River backwaters. The properties acquired are mostly vacant lands but in some of the cases there were also structures, like houses and compound walls, and in some also wells for which compensation was claimed and awarded The date of the notification under section 47 of the City Improvement Trust Act of 1945, which was held by the Land Acquisition Officer to be the relevant date for determining the market valuation of the lands, as under section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act was 24th August, 1948. Section 53 notification, corresponding to section 6 notification under the Land Acquisition Act, was published on 23rd May, 1950. The award itself was passed on 22nd November, 1951 Possession was taken thereafter.

The Land Acquisition Officer divided the lands into two groups “the developed group” and “the undeveloped group”. The “developed group”, called group I, by him, comprised the lands which had already amenities, or which were in the immediate vicinity of amenties like water, under-ground drainage electricity, etc., and were small plots which could be easily built on. They were also level The “undeveloped group” , called group II by him, consisted of bigger plots not having,the amenities, and not in the immediate vicinity of the amenities The Land Acquisition Officer valued the group I lands at Rs. 1,550 per ground, and the group II lands at Rs. 1,050 per ground. He gave only Rs. 650 per ground for 2 grounds and odd in A.S. No. 297 of 1953. He did not also award the 15 Per cent. solatium for compulsory acquisition. The claimants took out references under section 18.

The learned Judge, after considering the relevant sale-deeds exhaustively gave Rs. 2,000 per ground for group I lands, and Rs. 1,500 per ground for group II lands He has added in the judgment that all the parties agreed to the grouping and the gradation. He gave also the 15 percent. solatium for compulsory acquisition, under section 23 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, holding that even though the actual award itself in this case, and the taking of possession were after 27th February 1951, when the new City Improvement Trust Act had abolished the solatium, still the 15 per cent, solatium should be given, because the Land Acquisition proceedings had been begun earlier, and the valuation had to be as on the date of the section 4 (1) notification which was 24th August, 1948, long before the abolition He gave also certain sums for superstructures, wells, etc., and made certain deductions for levelling up in the case of low-lying lands. These details will be considered later, wherever necessary, in the respective appeals.

The Government have filed 31 appeals (of which 29 appeals are covered here) not only attacking the award of the 15 percent. solatium for compulsory acquisition, but also attacking the market value as enhanced by the learned Judge below. The claimants have filed 15 independent cross-appeals, in appeals filed by the Government, and two memoranda of cross-objections. They have also filed an appeal (A.S. No. 375 of 1953) where the Government have not filed any appeal. In all, there were 32 land cases. All of them are completely covered by the 31 appeals filed by the Government and by A.S. No. 375 of 1953 filed by the claimant. So, all the parties who were before the Court below and before the Land Acquisition Officer are before us to-day.

The other big scheme of acquisition may be referred to as the Mowbray’s





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top