SOMASUNDARAM
E. C. Richard – Appellant
Versus
Forest Range Officer, Mettupalayam – Respondent
This revision is preferred by the first accused in C.C. No. 2023 of 1956 on the file of the Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Mettupalayam. The present petitioner and five others were put up for trial before the Magistrate for an offence under section 21 (h) of the Madras Forest Act, 1882, read with Rule 7 (1), (2) and (8) of the Game Licence Rules, for having shot a female and an immature male deer without horns within the reserve forest of Mettupalayam range. All the accused were convicted of the offence with which they stood charged and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50 each by the trial Court. In appeal the learned District Magistrate acquitted accused 2 to 6 but confirmed the conviction and sentence of the first accused as he is stated to have shot a female deer and one male deer without horns contrary to the Gaming Rules in the Nilgiris area.
The main evidence against the petitioner consists in the statement made by him to P.W.1, Forest Range Officer who with his party of guards and foresters found the petitioner and others coming in a lorry with the said female and male deer. This statement is Exhibit P-1. It is a confession of his shooting the deer which he should not have sho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.