S.R. Nos. 32993 and 32996.-These relate to two memoranda of Civil Revision Petitions purporting to be under Article 227 of the Constitution against the order of a learned Judge of this Court on two interlocutory applications on the original side of this Court in two suits now pending on the original side of this Court having been transferred from the District Court of Ramnad. In Sahaba Reddy v. Venkata Reddy1, to which one of us was a party, it was decided that Article 227 of the Constitution is confined to subordinate Courts and a Judge of the High Court as such is not subordinate to the High Court and a Civil Revision Petition is not competent against an order of a learned Judge of this Court under that Article. This view has been followed by other Division Benches of this Court. The papers in these two S. R. Nos. must be returned to the party as the revision petitions sought to be preferred are not competent. S.R. Nos. 32989 and 32991 of 1956.-These relate to two original side appeals sought to be preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters patent against the same order of the learned Judge. In substance, by this order the learned Judge directed that the fourth defendant in C.