SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Mad) 66

PANCHAPAKESA AYYAR
K. S. Nataraja Achari – Appellant
Versus
J. K. Balasubramaniam – Respondent


Advocates:
T. R. Srinivasa Ayyar, for Petitioner.
K. G. Manickavachagam for Messrs. Subramanyam and Rajgopal, for Respondent,

Judgment

This is a petition by one Nataraja Achari, a goldsmith tenant making and selling gold, silver and diamond jewels in a portion of the premises rented out to the respondent, the chief tenant, for revising and setting aside the order of the appellate authority, the Judge of the Court of Small Causes, directing his eviction from the premises on the ground that the respondent-land-lord required the premises bona fide for additional accommodation for running the grain shop for which he bad made preparations, as his maligai shop, in the building opposite, was not prospering, and was landing him in heavy loss, and he wanted to run this grainshop in addition to the maligai shop in order to earn a comfortable living; The respondent is keeping roughly one half of the very tiny premises and is paying a total rent of Rs. 10 per mensem to Mr. K. Rajah Ayyar, the landlord. The petitioner is occupying the other half, and paying Rs. 9 as rent per month to the respondent, the chief-tenant. It is admitted by the learned counsel on both sides that no grain-trade can be carried on in the one half of these very tiny premises now in the occupation of the respondent, and that if grain-trade is to




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top