SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Mad) 45

P.V.RAJAMANNAR, PANCHAPAKESA AYYAR
Thangavelu Asari (died) – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Ramamurthi Ayvar for Appellants.
K. S. Sankara Ayyar for Respondents.

Rajamannar, C.J.-The dispute in this appeal relates to properties which originally belonged to, and were enjoyed by one Mookan Asari, the husband of the defendant. The plaintiff is his brother. The defendant’s husband died on 28th October, 1943, issueless leaving considerable properties. The plaintiff, the brother, filed a suit against the widow, the defendant, O.S. No. 239 of 1944, in the Court of the District Munsif of Ambasamudram, claiming the properties on the ground that the properties belonged to an undivided joint family of which he was the surviving coparcener. The defendant contended that the properties were the separate properties of Mookan Asari. Eventually the suit was compromised and a decree was passed on that compromise on 11th June, 1945. The main terms of the compromise were that the plaintiff should succeed to and be in enjoyment of the properties set out in Schedule I to the compromise with all rights and privileges and that the defendant should succeed to, and be in enjoyment of the properties in Sche.dule II of the compromise with all rights and privileges. In the decree which was passed in accordance with these terms the following clauses are material-

(1) "T











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top