SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Mad) 88

RAMASWAMI GOUNDER
Guruvayur Devaswom Trustees T. M. Krishnan Nambudiripad – Appellant
Versus
V. Kuttikrishna Menon – Respondent


Advocates:
V.P. Gopalan Nambiar for Petitioner.
Ravi Varma for Respondent.

Judgment

This is a Civil Revision Petition filed against the order made by the learned Subordinate Judge of Kozhikode in O.S. No. 76 of 1952.

The facts are: The plaintiff Kuttikrishna Menon was employed in the Guru-vaym Devaswom of which the present hereditary trustees are defendants 2 and 3. The plaintiff’s services were terminated with effect from 10th July, 1952. The plaintiff then rushed to Court with this suit in order to nullify this order and also for recovery of damages contending that the order terminating his services was illegal, void and inoperative and that he was not given an opportunity to explain the charges against him, if any, before removal from service. The contention of the defendants was that this suit was impliedly barred by reason of section 49 and 93 of the Madras Act XIX of 1951 read with section 9, Civil Procedure Code. The learned Subordinate Judge relying upon Kallalagar Devasthanam v. Thirumala Nambigal1 and Secretary of State v. Mask & Co.2, held that where principles of natural justice or judicial procedure have not been complied with, civil Courts have jurisdiction to examine into cases, and gave a finding under issue 1 that the suit was maintainable










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top