1955 Supreme(Mad) 333
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. Justice Govinda Menon and Mr. Justice Ramaswami GOUNDER, JJ
Bilige Laxminarayana Rao
Versus
A.P. Fernandes
Appeals Nos. 444 of 1951 and 144 of 1952.
Decided On : 15 December 1955
T. Krishna Rao for Appellants in both.
A. Narayana Pai and K. Srinivasa Rao for Respondents in App. No. 444 of 1951.
K.Y. Adiga and K.P. Adiga and S. Ramayya Nayak for Respondents in App. No. 144 of 1952.
Starting point of right to sue for possession of estate from alienee.
Headnote:Hindu Law -Subsequent surrender of alienation by widow and acquiring of title by adverse possession against widow.
While Lakshmi Amma was thus in possession of the properties pertaining to her husband’s 1/4th share, but which she got from her father under the sale deeds, Exhibits A-3 and A-4, she alienated the properties comprised in both the present suits. Under Exhibit B-6, dated 12th July, 1906, she alienated all the 26 items comprised in O.S. No. 172 of 1947 for Rs. 1,150, in favour of one Subbayya Shetty as the Yajaman of an aliyasanthana kutumba. The members of that family, on his death, are now represented by defendants 1 to 9 in that suit, and defendants 10 to 17 are persons said to be in possession of those properties as the mulgeni tenants of defendants 1 to 9. As regards the properties comprised in O.S. No. 48 of 1950 Lakshmi Amma sold item 1 to one Devappa for Rs. 260, under the sale deed, Exhibit A-5, dated 20th November, 1903, and the first defendant in that suit is said to be the auction-purchaser of that item. As regards item 2, the said Lakshmi Amma conveyed the mulgeni rights therein under Exhibit A-8, dated 15th August, 1913, to one Damodara Bhatta, the father of defendants 6 and 7 in that suit, defendants 2 to 4 being alienees of that item. As regards item 3 of that suit, the mulgeni rights therein were conveyed by Lakshmi Amma in favour of defendant 5 in that suit. It is common ground that all those alienees are in possession of the various suit items as purchasers since the date of their respective purchases.
Subba Rao the son of Ranga Rao and the father of the present plaintiffs 1 to 3, as one of the reversioners to the estate of Lakshmi A