RAJAGOPALAN
Srimathi Saraswathi Bai, by power of Attorney Agent T. S. Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Estates Abolition Tribunal, Madurai – Respondent
These are applications under Article 226 of the Constitution for the issue of writs of certiorari, to set aside the order of the Appellate Tribunal constituted under the Estates Abolition Act, confirming the orders of Assistant Settlement Officer.
The petitioner was the landholder entitled to what was known as the Pudur zamindari, which consisted of a number of villages. The estate vested in the Government after the Government issued the notification prescribed by section 3 of the Abolition Act. The petitioner applied to the Assistant Settlement Officer for ryotwari pattas for various items of lands, in nine villages. Except possibly in the case of one item in Melapatti Village, all the lands for which the petitioner applied for ryotwari pattas stood registered in the accounts maintained by the landholder as poramboke lands. Two of the items were described further as nandavanams. The rest were described as topes. The topes contained either tamarind or palmyrah trees.
There can be no doubt that the Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide ,the claim, and it should be remembered that the Appellate jurisdiction was invoked by the petitioner herself. The main contention of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.