SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Mad) 322

RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR
R. Kumaraswami Aiyar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Tiruvannamalai Municipality – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Arunachalam, for Petitioner.
The Special Government Pleader (V. V. Raghavan), for Respondents.

Order

The petitioner was employed as an upper division clerk in the Municipal Office at Tiruvannamalai and he has moved this Court for the issue of a writ of prohibition to direct the Commissioner of the Municipality not to proceed with certain disciplinary proceedings initiated with a view to terminate his service in the Municipality.

The facts giving rise to this petition are shortly these:

The petitioner, as mentioned earlier, is an upper division clerk in the Municipal Office at Tiruvannamalai. While so, he was charged before the Additional First Class Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai, of the offence of cheating under section 420, Indian Penal Code in C.C. No. 94 of 1955. The petitioner was convicted by the Additional First Class Magistrate on 29th March, 1954, but instead of sentencing him to imprisonment, taking into account the youth of the accused and the fact that he was a first offender the learned Magistrate directed him to be released on his entering into a bond on a sum of Rs. 500 with two sureties for a like amount under section 4(1) of the Madras Probation of Offenders Act (III of 1937).

Under Rule (3) of the Rules framed regulating the conditions and tenure of services under




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top