RAJAGOPALAN, SATYANARAYANA RAO
B. M. Amina Umma. – Appellant
Versus
The Income-Tax Officer, Kozhikode. – Respondent
The petitioner is the widow of Haji K.M. Ahmed Kutty. He had a twelve annas’ share in the partnership which consisted of himself and one Abdulla Ahmed Kutty who died on 5th July, 1950. His heirs were his two wives, three minor children by the first wife (the petitioner) and two minor children by the second wife. The partnership was reconstituted on 25th December, 1950 with three partners, the petitioner, Abdulla and Khader Kutti, brother of the petitioner. The three minor children of the petitioner were admitted to the benefits of that partnership with a total of eight annas’ share between them. The petitioner was entitled to a four annas’ share. This partnership also was registered under section 26-A of the Income-tax Act. After determining the income of the firm for the assessment year 1952-53, and after apportioning it between the sharers under section 23(5) of the Income-tax Act, the Income-ta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.