SATYANARAYANA RAO, RAJAGOPALAN
Ravula Subba Rao – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras – Respondent
“Where on the day fixed for hearing or any other day to which the hearing may be adjourned) the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called on for hearing, the Tribunal may, in its discretion, either dismiss the appeal for default or may hear it ex parte.”
The point raised in these petitions is that this rule is ultra vires and is opposed to section 33 (4) of the Income-tax Act. The rule-making power under section 5-A, sub-clause (8), is, of course, subject to the provisions of the Act, and the scope of the power is to regulate the procedure of the Appellate Tribunal and the procedure of Benches of the Tribunal in all matters arising out of the discharge of its functions, including the places at which the Benches shall hold their sittings. It is essentially a power to regulate the Tribunal’s own procedure, but is subject to the provisions of the Act.
The point
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.