1955 Supreme(Mad) 99
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mr. P.V. Rajamannar, Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Rajagopalan and Mr. Justice RajagopalaAyyangar, JJ.
The Board of Revenue, Chepauk, Madras Referring
Versus
K.Venkataswami Naidu
Case Referred No.102 of 1953.
Decided On : 28 March 1955
The Government Pleader (C.A.Vaidialingam) on behalf of the Referring Officer.
Messrs. C.Ramanujam and V.Ramaswami, for Respondent.
Lease of properties of touring Cinema liable to stamp duty.
Headnote:Stamp Act, 1899- Schedule 1-A, Article 30(a)(1) - Lease of properties of a touring cinema- Held, liable for payment of stamp duty being as a lease of immovable property.
The answer to the question depends upon whether the equipment of the touring cinema would fall within the category of immoveable property. We have no hesitation in holding that it does not. In the question referred to us, the properties are described as collapsible and capable of being removed. In the very nature of things properties of that nature cannot be immovable property. The expression. “permanently fastened” occurring in the question is a little misleading. Actually some of the machinery or the poles of the tent may be imbedded in the earth, but they are imbedded only temporarily and not permanently. If they were permanently fixed, the equipment would not form part of a touring cinema.
We have been taken through the material provisions of the lease deed and there is nothing therein, which lends support to the view that the lease covers any immoveable property. In our opinion, the lease in question is not chargeable to stamp duty under Article 30(a)(1) of Schedule 1-A of the Stamp Act.
K.S. ----- Reference answered.