SATYANARAYANA RAO
Chennupati Venkatasubbamma – Appellant
Versus
Nelluri Narayanaswami – Respondent
The first defendant is the appellant in this second appeal. The plaintiff, who is the sole respondent, instituted the suit out of which this second appeal arises for a declaration of his title to the suit properties and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession and enjoyment of the properties.
The plaintiff is the grandson of one Panaya. Plaintiff’s father is Subbaiah. Panaya had a brother Veeraiah who had no sons but had four daughters. One of the daughters was married to one Nallamothu Ramachandraiah who, after his marriage lived practically as the illatom son-in-law in the house of Veeraiah. The houses of Panaya and Veeraiah formed portions of the same house. Veeraiah by a gift deed Exhibit A-7 dated nth June, 1918, gifted away items 1 to 4 of the plaint schedule to Ramachandraiah his son-in-law and the fifth item in the plaint schedule was acquired by Ramachandraiah under Exhibit A-8 dated 8th August, 1022. For a long time, Ramachandraiah had no issue. On 15th May, 1930, by Exhibit B-6, Ramachandraiah purported to gift away items 1 to 5 of the plaint schedule properties to the plaintiff subject to certain conditions. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.