This second appeal arises out of a suit in ejectment. The tenant is the appellant. On 12th April, 1933, the appellant and his father the 1st defendant, executed in favour of the plaintiff-respondent, a chalgenichit in respect of the suit holding. The period of the lease was one year, but after the efflux of the period the tenants did not surrender possession but continued to be in occupation. There was a renewal of the lease in 1937 and again in 1942, Exhibits A-14 and A-13. On 6th November, 1945, the landlord issued a registered notice calling upon the tenants to quit and deliver possession. The suit in ejectment was filed on 17th April, 1946. Both the Courts below have decreed the suit.

In the second appeal, Mr. Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the appellant, urged two grounds. He first contended that there was no proper notice to quit. This contention is based entirely on the fact that in the notice to quit Exhibit B-1, there is a reference to the chalgenichit dated 12th April, 1933, but there is no reference to the two renewals in 1937 and 1942. I do not think that the omission to mention the two later leases, in any way renders the notice to quit improper or invalid.