SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Mad) 204

P.V.RAJAMANNAR, VENKATARAMA AYYAR
Nagoor Ammal (died) – Appellant
Versus
M. K. M. Meeran. – Respondent


Advocates:
V.V. Raghavan for Appellants.
S.K. Ahmed Meeran and T.P. Gopalakrishnan for Respondents.

Rajamannar C.J.-

This is an appeal under the Letters Patent against the judgment of Rajagopalan J. with his leave dismissing second appeal No. 1958 of 1946.

It arises out of a suit for partition of property which originally belonged to one Hussain Meera, a sunni Mahomedan. On 9th November, 1914 he executed a deed of settlement (Exhibit P-1) in favour of his second wife Nainammal Bibi. The occasion was his proposed marriage to a third wife. The decision of this appeal depends on a construction of the terms of this settlement deed. The material: portions of this deed are as follows:

“I have settled upon you for your maintenance the undermentioned nanja land worth Rs. 2,000. Therefore this is a settlement deed executed (by me) consenting that you should enjoy for your life time the income alone for the said nanja land, that you should not make any gift, sale or hypothecation, etc. of the said land, that if you should hereafter have issue by me, the said issue should enjoy the said land hereditarily, and that if you should not have such issue that said property after your lifetime go to me and to my heirs”. (Santhathi)

Hussain Meera died in 1925. He had no issue by Nainammal, his second wi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top